INTERDISCIPLINARY FRONTIERS
BRIDGING KNOWLEDGE FOR CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36674/mythos.v22i1.986Keywords:
Interdisciplinary Research, Wicked Problems, Methodological Integration, Institutional Constraints, Theoretical-methodological approach, Sustainable SolutionsAbstract
Interdisciplinary research has emerged as a fundamental approach to tackling the multifaceted challenges of the modern world. By integrating methods, theories, and perspectives from diverse disciplines, interdisciplinarity transcends the limitations of singular disciplinary frameworks, enabling a more holistic understanding of complex issues. This editorial explores the increasing prominence of interdisciplinary research, evidenced by bibliometric trends that demonstrate a steady rise in cross-disciplinary citations since the 1980s. While such research often experiences delayed recognition, its long-term impact is significant, fostering paradigm shifts and new research trajectories. Despite its potential, interdisciplinary research encounters substantial barriers, including epistemological divides, institutional constraints, and methodological incompatibilities. These challenges are particularly pronounced in addressing "wicked problems"—issues characterized by ambiguity, competing values, and systemic interdependencies, such as climate change, healthcare equity, and sustainable agriculture. The success of interdisciplinary initiatives depends not only on methodological integration but also on reflexivity and epistemic humility, acknowledging the biases inherent in different disciplinary perspectives. This editorial highlights key domains where interdisciplinary collaboration is imperative: healthcare innovations, technological and agricultural advances, and socio-cultural and economic transformations. In these areas, solutions must reconcile scientific, ethical, and socio-political considerations to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes. Recognizing the need for institutional reforms, scholarly platforms like Mythos play a crucial role in legitimizing and fostering interdisciplinary dialogue. By embracing methodological pluralism and collaborative rigor, interdisciplinary research can illuminate pathways toward a more just and sustainable future, addressing the urgent challenges of our time with integrated and adaptive strategies.
References
Léle, S., & Norgaard, R. B. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinary. BioScience, 55(11), 967–975. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0967:PI]2.0.CO;2
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Van Noorden, R. (2015). Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. Nature, 525(7569), 306–307. https://www.nature.com/news/interdisciplinary-research-by-the-numbers-1.18349
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rodrigo Franklin Frogeri, Pedro dos Santos Portugal Júnior

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since January of 2024, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal Mythos, from FEPESMIG, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.