BRIDGING THE GENERATION GAP
UNDERSTANDING BABY BOOMERS' AND GEN Z'S PERCEPTIONS OF BANKING APPS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36674/mythos.v21i1.834Keywords:
Baby-Boomer, Digital banks, Fintechs, Gen Z, Technology Acceptance Model, UTAUT2Abstract
In 2023, global banking and investment services IT spending surged to $652.1 billion, marking an 8.1% increase from 2022. Mobile banking, constituting over half of transactions, emerged as the predominant channel. Despite substantial technological investments, understanding the reasons behind mobile app usage remains crucial, particularly among the different generations. Thus, this study analyzes the perception of "baby boomer" and "Z" generations regarding the adoption of banking apps. Twenty individuals across generations with varying app familiarity participated in qualitative interviews. The data was analyzed using the Content Analysis technique. Our findings suggest that users value the convenience of app-based transactions, reducing reliance on physical banks. Generation Z favors digital banks, while baby boomers trust traditional ones, citing concerns like connectivity issues, tech knowledge limitations, and cost-benefit considerations. Non-using Generation Z individuals cite age, maturity, security concerns, and lack of social influence as reasons. Apprehensions about using other apps prevail among baby boomer users, echoing non-users' fears, emphasizing the significant role of fear in decision-making, possibly linked to reported digital data theft and virtual scams.
References
Addy, M. N., Addo, E. T., Kwofie, T. E., & Yartey, J. E. (n.d.). Predicting the adoption of e-procurement in construction project delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: an application of UTAUT2. CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-09-2021-0174
Alves-Mazzotti, A. J., & Gewandsznajder, F. (2004). O método nas ciências naturais e sociais: pesquisas quantitativas e qualitativas (2nd ed.). PIONEIRA Thompson Learning.
BACEN. (2021). Fintechs. Banco Central Do Brasil. https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/fintechs
Bardin, L. (2013). L’analyse de contenu. PUF.
Chauhan, S., Akhtar, A., & Gupta, A. (2022). Customer experience in digital banking: a review and future research directions. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 14(2), 311–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2021-0027
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de Pesquisa: Métodos Qualitativo, Quantitativo e Misto. Artmed.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989a). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989b). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
FEBRABAN. (2019). Aplicativos de bancos evoluem e ganham novas funções. FEBRABAN Tech. https://febrabantech.febraban.org.br/temas/banco-digital/aplicativos-de-bancos-evoluem-e-ganham-novas-funces
FEBRABAN. (2023). Brasileiro aumenta em 30% suas transações bancárias em 2022, e oito em cada dez operações são digitais. FEBRABAN Tech. https://febrabantech.febraban.org.br/temas/inovacao/brasileiro-aumenta-em-30-suas-transacoes-bancarias-em-2022-e-oito-em-cada-dez-operacoes-sao-digitais
Feliciano, A. D. P., & Frogeri, R. F. (2018). A Dinâmica de Uso dos Aplicativos Móveis Bancários: uma análise sob a perspectiva da população idosa. Revista de Sistemas e Computação, 8(2), 1–14. https://revistas.unifacs.br/index.php/rsc/article/view/5699/3661
Feliciano, A. D. P., Frogeri, R. F., & Prado, L. Á. (2018). A ACEITAÇÃO DOS APLICATIVOS MÓVEIS BANCÁRIOS NO BRASIL: uma análise da utilidade percebida e facilidade de uso. INTERAÇÃO, 20(1), 206–231. https://periodicos.unis.edu.br/index.php/interacao/article/download/175/159/
Gama Junior, F. da C., Frogeri, R. F., Piurcosky, F. P., & Carvalho, E. G. (2024). ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS DURING COVID-19: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FEDERAL AND PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. Mythos (Interdisciplinary), 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36674/mythos.v21i1.825
Gartner. (2023). Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Banking and Investment Services IT Spending to Reach $652 Billion in 2023. Current Economic Uncertainty Driving Organizations to Invest in Agile IT Infrastructure. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2023-06-21-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-banking-and-investment-services-it-spending-to-reach-652-billion-in-2023
Grani, A., & Maranguni, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Hameed, S., & Nigam, A. (2023). Exploring India’s Generation Z perspective on AI enabled internet banking services. Foresight, 25(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2021-0213
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
Karim, M. W., Ulfy, M. A., & Huda, M. N. (2020). Determining intention to use smartphone banking application among millennial cohort in Malaysia. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 9(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.11.2020.91.43.53
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Kitsios, F., Giatsidis, I., & Kamariotou, M. (2021). Digital transformation and strategy in the banking sector: Evaluating the acceptance rate of e-services. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030204
Koenaite, M., Maziriri, E., & Chuchu, T. (2021). Attitudes Towards Utilising Mobile Banking Applications Among Generation Z Consumers in South Africa. Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(6), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr26.1452021
Kopplin, C. S., Gantert, T. M., & Maier, J. V. (2022). Acceptance of matchmaking tools in coworking spaces: an extended perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 16(6), 1911–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00498-1
Lisana, L. (2024). Understanding the key drivers in using mobile payment among Generation Z. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2021-0118
Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The Technology Acceptance Model: A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 16(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2004010104
Maria, H. D. S., Frogeri, R. F., Piurcosky, F. P., & Prado, L. Á. (2021). Remotely Piloted Aircraft?: Analysis of the Deployment in Aeronautical Accident Investigation Bureau. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management (JATM), 13(e0121), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1590/jatm.v13.1187
Matar, A., & Alkhawaldeh, A. M. (2022). Adoption of electronic cards using Wi-Fi platform services by clients of banking sector during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790221112797
Melnyk, V. (2023). Transforming the nature of trust between banks and young clients: from traditional to digital banking. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-08-2022-0129
Minayo, M. C. de S. (2012). Análise qualitativa: teoria, passos e fidedignidade. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17(3), 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300007
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Rodrigues, H. (2023). e-Banking Usage by Generations X, Y, and Z. Application OfEmerging Technologies, 115, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004320
Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Vervier, L. S., Valdez, A. C., & Ziefle, M. (2022). Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/26453
Srivastava, S., Mohta, A., & Shunmugasundaram, V. (2024). Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 26(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2023-0110
Suo, W. J., Goi, C. L., Goi, M. T., & Sim, A. K. S. (2022). Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention to Adopt the QR-Code Payment: Extending UTAUT2 Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJABIM.20220701.oa8
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.42.1.85
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005
Urquhart, C. (2012). Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Quide. Sage.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and user of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00163.x
Wewege, L., Lee, J., & C. Thomsett, M. (2020). Disruptions and Digital Banking Trends. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 10(6), 15–56. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Luigi-
Wewege/publication/343050625_Disruptions_and_Digital_Banking_Trends/links/5f136f93a6fdcc3ed7153217/Disruptions-and-Digital-Banking-Trends.pdf
Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(2), 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170
Zmoginski, F. (2019). A geração que desafia os bancos. FEBRABAN. https://febrabantech.febraban.org.br/temas/banco-digital/a-geracao-que-desafia-os-bancos
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Since January of 2024, the authors retain the copyright relating to their article and grant the journal Mythos, from FEPESMIG, the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF document. This license provides that the article published can be shared (allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapted (allows you to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial) by anyone.
